IUP Publications Online
Home About IUP Magazines Journals Books Archives
     
Recommend    |    Subscriber Services    |    Feedback    |     Subscribe Online
 
The IUP Journal of Soft Skills
The Effect of Transactional Analysis Ego States on Conflict Management Styles
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
 
 
 
 
 
 

This paper aims to assess the transactional analysis ego states and conflict management style of employees of the banking sector, and to explore the relationship between them. The data was collected from a survey of 300 male employees working in different private and public banks in the age group of 23-60 years, with minimum education taken as graduation. The result reveals that there exists a relationship between the transactional analysis ego states of banking employees and their conflict management style. The study reveals that banking employees of child ego state use competing style (Win-Lose); adult ego state use accommodating style (Lose-Win); and parent ego state use competing style (Win-Lose) as their conflict management style.

 
 

According to Berne, two people interact with each other from one of the three psychological positions known as ego states: Parent, Adult, and Child; and a person can operate from any one of the three. People whose Parent ego state is in control may be protective, controlling, nurturing, critical, or instructive. People with Adult ego state are reasonable, have clear thinking, calm, thoughtful, negotiating and unemotional. Their decision making is based on facts, data and probabilities. The Child ego state reflects the emotions developed in response to childhood experiences. They are impulsive, charming, humorous, creative, spontaneous and carefree. Like an actual child, the Child ego state desires approval from others and prefers immediate rewards.

Martin (2004) suggested that transactional analysis provides four essential steps to reaching a peaceful conflict resolution: (1) Centering yourself, (2) Connecting with the aggressor, (3) Channeling the attack so that neither you nor your aggressor gets hurt, and (4) Safely concluding the interaction. According to Shmukler (2001), transactional analysis can be applied to cross-cultural, social, and organizational settings. Çam and Akkoyun (2001) carried out experimental study to test the effectiveness of a communication skills program on transactional analysis ego states and the problem-solving scores of prospective teachers. Hay (2000) describes applications of transactional analysis within organizations with a metaphor of a ship, which provides a model for understanding the ‘hardware’ and ‘software’ of an organization and how these contribute to the climate and culture. Rani and Thomas (2005) studied the relationship between various levels of employees and their performances with respect to the various transactional analysis.

 
 

Soft Skills Journal, Transactional Analysis, Ego States, Conflict Management Styles, Competing, Collaborating, Avoiding, Accommodating, Compromising.